Home » 2007 » June » Page 2

Jun

12

Personal Injury Case To Be Continued…

Posted by mbrickley | Posted in Personal Injury Cases in the News

No, it’s not some cliffhanger to the season finale of some popular television show but rather a real-life personal injury case that is to be continued. A medical emergency has forced an Illinois judge to stop a personal injury case in which William Clawson was suing the man who repossessed his car. Clawson had claimed that he suffered severe neck injuries and medical anguish when he drove a golf cart in front of his car on February 27, 2005. Clawson has also alleged that he thought his car was being stolen (it was actually being repossessed) and thus drove the golf cart in front of it. While on the way to court to testify as a key witness in the trial last week, Clawson’s wife suffered a heart attack and was hospitalized; thus prompting Madison County Circuit Judge David Hylla to reassign the case to June 18th.

While he had been seeking $100,000 in damages, Clawson must now wait for his wife to recover from her own physical damages. Hylla has said that 11 of the original 13 jurors in the case will continue in the case, and that he will choose two replacement jurors before the trial begins. Read more about this interesting personal injury case in this story from The Madison County Record.

Jun

11

New York Track Star Dies from Overuse of Sports Cream

Posted by Editor | Posted in Personal Injury Cases in the News

A New York medical examiner has determined that a 17-year-old track star died after overusing sports cream. Arielle Newman, a cross-country runner at Staten Island’s Notre Dame Academy, died after her body absorbed high levels of methyl salicylate, a compound found in many anti-inflammatory creams, such as Bengay and Icy Hot.

A medical examiner’s spokeswoman said it was the first case of death from using a sports cream the office had encountered. She said Newman was spreading the muscle cream on her legs between competitions, applying adhesive pads containing the anti-inflammatory, and using an unspecified third product containing the chemical.

A spokesman for Johnson & Johnson, the maker of Bengay, expressed sympathy over the death, but reminded consumers about “the importance of reading the label on this and all over-the-counter medicines to ensure safe and proper use.” According to the Associated Press, the label on Ultra Strength Bengay says the product should be applied no more than three or four times daily and consumers should stop and see a doctor if the condition worsens or symptoms persist for more than a week.

Can we expect a personal injury lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson?

Jun

8

Mother of Shooting Victim Awarded $10 Million in Bronx Personal Injury Lawsuit

Posted by Editor | Posted in Personal Injury Cases in the News

The mother of a man who was shot and killed seven years ago in a struggle with a New York police officer was awarded $10 million in punitive damages on Wednesday. A NY1 News story detailed how 23-year-old Malcolm Ferguson was unarmed in March of 2000 when he was shot during an altercation with plain-clothed police officer Louis Rivera, who is still with the NYPD but now works a desk job and no longer carries a gun. While the death was ruled accidental, the victim’s mother, Bronx resident Juanita Young, has claimed that her son was a victim of police brutality. While Young has vowed to continue to fight for the rights of victims of police brutality, the New York City Law Department has said that it will appeal the ruling of this personal injury lawsuit as the jury agreed that the shooting was an accident. The NYC Law Department added in a statement that it is confident the wrongful death verdict would be dropped in the appeals process.

Young has said that she will like to see the criminal case reopened and charges filed against Rivera. We’ll keep you updated on any more developments with this case.

Jun

7

Need for Random Drug Testing Revealed in Recent Train Accidents

Posted by Editor | Posted in Personal Injury Cases in the News

An interesting Boston Globe story detailed how the Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad recently came to a “good faith” safety agreement with the Federal Railroad Association in which the MBCR will try to get its workers’ union to agree to random drug testing. Amazingly, the MBCR does not have the authority under federal rules to require drug tests of the 276 members of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees that work for them. This safety agreement comes in the wake of a January train accident in Woburn in which two train workers were killed and four others suffered serious personal injuries. A source close to the investigation revealed that one of the workers who was struck by the train tested positive for marijuana.

Specifically, the workers involved in this accident failed to install a required safety device which activates signals to train conductors that workers are on the tracks. Federal investigators later found the metal shunt device in the truck nearby and learned that a dispatcher mistakenly let the train go through the work site.

Unfortunately, this is not the first time that railroad workers have been found to be under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Two employees tested positive for drugs and alcohol during a fatal train accident in Gloucester last June. The story said that federal officials are considering fining the MBCR for failing to send specimens from the dead workers for testing in proper time, which begs the question of why they are still considering the fine and haven’t implemented one already.

With the safety of not only these workers but also daily commuters who use the MBCR on the line, it is vital that random drug testing be allowed. The union has expressed a willingness to discuss the proposed safety agreement and will meet with officials of the railroad on June 26th. Here’s hoping that they are able to agree on the importance of drug testing in preventing these types of disturbing train accidents in the future.  

Jun

6

Virginia Personal Injury Lawsuit to Challenge State Law Concering Restaurant Liability

Posted by Editor | Posted in Personal Injury Cases in the News

The death of St. Louis Cardinals pitcher Josh Hancock in a drunk driving accident last month was detailed throughout the country, and Hancock’s father just recently sued the bar which served his son prior to the fatal accident. In a somewhat similar light, the father of a Virginia Beach teenager who died in a recent drunk driving accident caused by someone else has filed a multi-million personal injury lawsuit against the restaurant which served the DUI suspect. Alison Kunhardt and her friend Tessa Trachant were killed on March 30th when alleged drunken driver Alfredo Ramos slammed into the back of their vehicle shortly after leaving the Ensenadas Mexican Restaurant. In a personal injury lawsuit seeking in excess of $10 million, David Kunhardt has claimed that employees at the restaurant knew that Ramos was intoxicated but served him throughout the evening of the fatal accident.

A WAVY.com story detailed how Virginia is one of a few states that does not hold restaurants liable for the actions of their patrons and how this personal injury lawsuit is hoping to change this law. Current Virginia law also prohibits restaurants from serving patrons who are drunk, which Ramos allegedly was when he entered the restaurant on the night of the deadly accident. Ramos has been charged with involuntary manslaughter in the deaths and is scheduled to appear in court on June 26th. We’ll keep you updated on any more developments with this Virginia personal injury lawsuit and this challenged law.

Jun

5

Heely Injuries a Case of a Lack of Safety or Product Liability?

Posted by Editor | Posted in Personal Injury Cases in the News

A recent report from the Consumer Product Safety Commission revealed that 64 injuries and one death were reported last year involving the Heely, which is a popular children’s shoe containing a wheel on the bottom that can be used to roll around like a roller skate. In Illinois, this report drew the interest of several news sources on Monday night. A short piece on Chicago’s Fox 32 News on Monday night detailed this CPSC report while a story on WMBD-WYZZ TV examined one Peoria orthopedic surgeon’s opinion of the product. Dr. James Williams alleged in the story that rocks can often get caught in the gaps between the wheels and the sole of the shoe and cause kids to lose control and fall down. Williams suggested that these shoes are especially harder for younger kids to balance; thus making them more susceptible to injury.

Williams added that he has already seen anywhere from 20 to 30 children this year for treatment of Heely-sustained injuries, which most notably included hurt wrists and ankles. The surgeon suggested that parents require their kids to wear helmets and elbow and knee pads when using Heelys. It will be interesting to see if there are any more stories in the future about Heely injuries or whether this is just a matter of the need for better safety with the product.

Jun

4

Kentucky Leads the Nation in Dubious Category of Fatal ATV Accidents!

Posted by Editor | Posted in Personal Injury Cases in the News

The Injury Blog has detailed in the past how ATV accidents can lead to serious personal injuries, and a recent WKYT–WYMT story provided some disturbing numbers about these dangers in Kentucky. The story examined state police records from 2000 to 2007 and noted that 131 people have died in Kentucky ATV accidents during that time. In fact, the Consumer Product Safety Commission has ranked Kentucky as the number state in the country for fatal ATV accidents during the last three years.

The story added that the six deadliest counties for Kentucky ATV accidents were in the mountains of East Kentucky. Coroner Richard New said in the story that most of those accidents occurred due to people who were riding ATVs in areas that they were not familiar with. Pike County has witnessed 9 ATV deaths from 2000-2007 and led all Kentucky counties in this dubious distinction in the time period.

Jun

1

“Flea” Proves to be His Own Biggest Pest in Boston Personal Injury Lawsuit

Posted by Editor | Posted in Personal Injury Cases in the News

A Boston pediatrician who was blogging under the name of “Flea” about a personal injury lawsuit in which he was a defendant quickly came to terms with the family of a boy suing him for their son’s death after it was revealed during the trial that he was the arrogant blogger. Specifically, Robert P. Lindeman was sued by the family of Jaymes Binns, a 12-year-old boy who died of diabetic ketoacidosis in March of 2002, in a personal injury suit claiming that Lindeman failed to diagnose their son’s diabetes. A Boston Globe story detailed how Lindeman used his personal blog, the drfleablog, to ridicule the case of the Binns’ family and their lawyer Elizabeth N. Mulvey, who pulled out a surprise in court when she asked the doctor whether he was in fact Flea. Lindeman confessed to his alter-identity, settled the case a day later and took down his blog shortly thereafter.

So if you’re wondering why Lindeman would use the word “Flea,” here’s the medical explanation. A flea is apparently what surgeons call pediatricians in training. Neither Lindeman nor his attorney had any client on the case, even though the pediatrician did a lot of talking on his blog. Lindeman apparently revealed the strategy of the defense, accused the jury of dozing off, and even made fun of Mulvey for biting her nails during the case.

Lindeman’s arrogance was especially apparent in claims on the blog that the plaintiff was not going to win with its current approach of painting the defendant as a jerk. After his disclosure in court, Lindeman apparently felt the heat when Mulvey relayed that she was prepared to leak his unabashed comments about the jurors, lawyers and legal process. Lindeman came to a quick settlement, which was not revealed but described as being substantial. The parents of Jaymes Binns did not have any comment on the case.

Read more about this case at the New York Personal Injury Law Blog: Doctor "Flea" Settles Malpractice Suit After Blog Exposed In Court.

Disclaimer: The content found on the TotalInjury Blog is not legal advice and is purely for informational purposes. Total Injury, Inc. does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of submissions. The information provided by the bloggers on this site may not represent the opinions of the site editor(s), Total Injury, Inc. or its affiliates. The information contained herein is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. For additional disclaimers, please visit our Terms & Conditions. All photos are of models and do not depict clients.