Home » $3 Million Personal Injury Verdict Awarded for Ohio Woman’s Prempro Personal Injuries

Feb

22

$3 Million Personal Injury Verdict Awarded for Ohio Woman’s Prempro Personal Injuries

Posted by Editor | Posted in Personal Injury News

An Ohio woman who claimed that the hormone replacement drug Prempro caused her breast cancer was awarded $3 million after a Philadelphia jury determined earlier this week that the drug’s manufacturer, Wyeth, was liable for her personal injuries. The personal injury attorneys of 67-year-old Jennie Nelson claimed that Wyeth knew for decades that the drug caused breast cancer, did not warn patients and rather minimized such risks. Nelson, a resident of Dayton, took Prempro for five years to treat symptoms of menopause and was later diagnosed with breast cancer in 2001, according to an Associated Press story. The Philadelphia jury specifically found that Wyeth failed to provide an adequate warning to Nelson about these side effects.

Wyeth has been hit with more than 5,000 product liability lawsuits over its hormone replacement drugs Prempro and Premarin. Earlier this month, an Arkansas woman was awarded the first major plaintiff victory in these Prempro product liability suits when she was given $1.5 million. Nelson had originally been awarded an $1.5 million personal injury verdict last fall, but the judge declared a mistrial. Wyeth said that it respectfully disagrees with Tuesday’s jury finding that Prempro caused Nelson’s cancer and plans to appeal.

Wyeth has now won and lost two of these product liability cases, according to the Associated Press story. A recent Bloomberg.com story estimates that six million women took Prempro to treat menopause prior to a 2002 Women’s Health Initiative study which revealed such risks. Both Prempro and Premarin are still on the market and approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • LinkedIn
  • Print this article!
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

1

Comments (1)

i don’t understand why wyeth would settle with 2 prempro cases and would deny any affect on the other 5100 women. if prempro affects these two women why would’nt it affect the rest of us. prempro is prempro. it is like to me if you give 10 women arsenic why would you only settle with 8 women. do you understand where i am coming from. a poison if a poison.
thank you again.

Post a comment

PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT. THIS WEB SITE IS A GROUP ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEYS ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Total Injury is not a law firm. Total Injury does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. The information contained herein is not legal advice. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Any information you submit to Total Injury may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys. An attorney responsible for the content of this Site is Kevin W. Chern, Esq., licensed in Illinois with offices at 25 East Washington, Suite 510, Chicago, Illinois 60602. To see the attorney in your area who is responsible for this advertisement, please click here.

If you live in Florida, Mississippi, Missouri, New York or Wyoming, please click here for additional information.

The content found on the TotalInjury Blog is not legal advice and is purely for informational purposes. Total Injury, Inc. does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of submissions. The information provided by the bloggers on this site may not represent the opinions of the site editor(s), Total Injury, Inc. or its affiliates. The information contained herein is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. For additional disclaimers, please visit our Terms & Conditions. All photos are of models and do not depict clients.