Home » A Reasonable Outcome for an Unreasonable Case

Jun

10

A Reasonable Outcome for an Unreasonable Case

Posted by Editor | Posted in Personal Injury Cases in the News

Generally the basis of a personal injury lawsuit is an actual injury, or at least some type of actual damages.  However, from time to time a case comes along that pushes the boundaries of reality too far and makes a farce of the judicial system.

For some reason a Canadian hairdresser had been awarded $341,775 in damages in a personal injury lawsuit that he filed after finding a fly in his water bottle.  Waddah (Martin) Mustapha claimed in his lawsuit that he suffered extreme emotional trauma because he saw the fly in his water bottle.  He did not actually drink from the bottle of water.

In a moment of sanity, the Supreme Court of Canada threw out the award for damages that were awarded to Mustapha in a lower court.  The Globe and Mail reported that the court found that Culligan of Canada Ltd. could not have reasonably foreseen the man’s extreme reaction to merely seeing the fly and can not possibly be found liable for his psychological disturbance.

To read about another ridiculous personal injury lawsuit see:  Infamous “Pants Judge” Files a New Personal Injury Lawsuit

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google

0

Post a comment

Disclaimer: The content found on the TotalInjury Blog is not legal advice and is purely for informational purposes. Total Injury, LLC. does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of submissions. The information provided by the bloggers on this site may not represent the opinions of the site editor(s), Total Injury, Inc. or its affiliates. The information contained herein is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. For additional disclaimers, please visit our Terms & Conditions. All photos are of models and do not depict clients.