Home » Fear of Pit Bull Attack Leads to Law Suit

Nov

19

Fear of Pit Bull Attack Leads to Law Suit

Posted by admin | Posted in Personal Injury News

By

Conflict of a pit bull in the northern suburbs of Chicago has lead to a law suit to ban the animal from the neighborhood.

A recent article in the Chicago Tribune is reporting that residents of suburban Wilmette have filed a suit against the owners of a pit bull with the aim of banning the dog.

According to the report, John Grady, the plaintiff, has alleged that the pit bull has escaped on three occasions and acted in aggressive and vicious behavior.

“We did it with a heave heart because we regard lawsuits with neighbors as things to be avoided if at all possible,” said Grady.  “There just came a time when we had to act to protect our children.”

While the article does discuss the three escapes of the pit bull, it does not allege that the dog has actually bitten or injured anyone.  But, because the neighborhood has more than 40 children on the street, neighbors like Grady don’t want to wait for an injury.

The pit bull, which is a rescue dog, “allegedly attempted to attack a young child playing in a nearby yard, according to the lawsuit… The suit states neither Albright [the dog’s owner] nor her parents, were present during the incident, though the family declined comment.”

The pit bull is owned by Megan Albright, who recently moved back in to her parents house.  Albright also allegedly owns a Doberman Pinscher.

In the suit, Grady alleges that, in one instance, after the pit bull escaped, Megan’s father retrieved the dog and said that the dog was mean and “I can’t understand why [Megan] keeps it.”

It raises issues that remind many of breed bans in areas like Denver.  In Denver, residents are forbidden from owning pit bulls.  This has caused frustration for owners, and confusion for what exactly constitutes a pit bull.

In this case, the rescue dog has not yet caused any injuries.  The fear of injuries or death has caused the families to attempt to take preemptive measure.  Grady, and three other families that joined the plaintiffs side of the suit, allege that the dog has taken an “attack position” several times.

In general, courts are not likely to require defendants to take certain actions when there is yet to be any harm.  The court will have to carefully evaluate the potential harm of the pit bull when it determines whether or not to require Albright to find alternative housing for the animal.

Until the case is heard and more facts are released, it seems that the pit bull will remain in Wilmette.  Hopefully that means that the dog will remain safely inside the Albright home and not interacting with residents on the streets.

Be Sociable, Share!

0

Comments are closed.

PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT. THIS WEB SITE IS A GROUP ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEYS ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Total Injury is not a law firm. Total Injury does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. The information contained herein is not legal advice. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Any information you submit to Total Injury may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys. An attorney responsible for the content of this Site is Kevin W. Chern, Esq., licensed in Illinois with offices at 25 East Washington, Suite 510, Chicago, Illinois 60602. To see the attorney in your area who is responsible for this advertisement, please click here.

If you live in Florida, Mississippi, Missouri, New York or Wyoming, please click here for additional information.

The content found on the TotalInjury Blog is not legal advice and is purely for informational purposes. Total Injury, Inc. does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of submissions. The information provided by the bloggers on this site may not represent the opinions of the site editor(s), Total Injury, Inc. or its affiliates. The information contained herein is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. For additional disclaimers, please visit our Terms & Conditions. All photos are of models and do not depict clients.