Home » Ford Settles Injury Lawsuits After SUV Paralyzes Woman

Feb

15

Ford Settles Injury Lawsuits After SUV Paralyzes Woman

Posted by meaghano | Posted in Car Accident Cases

The Ford Motor Company opted to settle for most of the requested $17.7 million in a personal injury lawsuit after a Ford SUV crash left a woman paralyzed from the neck down.

Ford decided to pay $16 million to Lynn Wheeler recently during the end of a trial in Clayton County, Ga., while they jury was deciding whether to fine Ford for punitive damages beyond the initially-requested $17.7 million, according to an article in the Fulton County Daily Report.

The jury ruled that Ford was liable for damages to compensate what Wheeler and her attorneys described as design problems with the Ford Explorer.

Around Christmas 2005, Wheeler was riding in the middle of the back seat in a 2002 Ford Explorer sport model SUV, which seats five passengers, according to the Fulton County Daily Report. Wheeler’s son was driving, his wife was seated in the front seat and Wheeler herself was seated between her two young grandchildren in booster seats.

A smaller sport coupe was coming the opposite way and lost control while making a turn. The vehicle slammed head-on into the Explorer. Alan Hamilton, one of the plaintiff’s attorneys, said that Wheeler’s son, daughter-in-law and grandchildren walked away from the car accident with “essentially no significant injury at all.”

Wheeler, on the other hand, was severely injured. With a lap seat belt to hold her, Wheeler was sent forward and down at force when the rear seat latch failed and collapsed on her, according to the Daily Report.

The pre-trial report read that “Lynn Wheeler’s head and neck were driven down and forward into the front seat and/or center console, catastrophically injuring her spinal cord.”

Hamilton said that Wheeler is also on a ventilator to help with breathing, in addition to being paralyzed.

The suit claimed the auto maker was negligent on the vehicle’s design of both the rear seat latch and the lap belt put in place for the middle seat rear seat, instead of a belt with a shoulder restraint of some sort.

The suit also claimed Ford did not provide enough warning for both the Wheelers and the general public about the possibility of the injury that happened to Lynn.

Ford argued that at the time, the Explorer had exceeded all government-mandated safety requirements.

Attorneys for the company argued further that the lap belt was a needed addition to accommodate child safety seats, and that they can be safer for smaller children who do not fit properly with shoulder-restraining belts.

Ford’s attorneys argued that it was not technologically possible to install a shoulder-belt in the middle of a bench seat, which is where Wheeler was seated.

Ford’s attorneys also argued that the rear seat latch was tested to hold through similar force as the accident that Wheeler was in.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • LinkedIn
  • Print this article!
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

1

Comments (1)

thanks for your detailed descriptions. I can picture my self on their feet in the situation. it’s really sad but good hing Ford paid up.

Post a comment

PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT. THIS WEB SITE IS A GROUP ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEYS ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Total Injury is not a law firm. Total Injury does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. The information contained herein is not legal advice. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Any information you submit to Total Injury may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys. An attorney responsible for the content of this Site is Kevin W. Chern, Esq., licensed in Illinois with offices at 25 East Washington, Suite 510, Chicago, Illinois 60602. To see the attorney in your area who is responsible for this advertisement, please click here.

If you live in Florida, Mississippi, Missouri, New York or Wyoming, please click here for additional information.

The content found on the TotalInjury Blog is not legal advice and is purely for informational purposes. Total Injury, Inc. does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of submissions. The information provided by the bloggers on this site may not represent the opinions of the site editor(s), Total Injury, Inc. or its affiliates. The information contained herein is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. For additional disclaimers, please visit our Terms & Conditions. All photos are of models and do not depict clients.