Home » Johnson & Johnson Product Liability Lawsuit: 11 Women Sue over Ortho Evra Personal Injuries

Feb

16

Johnson & Johnson Product Liability Lawsuit: 11 Women Sue over Ortho Evra Personal Injuries

Posted by Editor | Posted in Personal Injury News

Eleven women from states throughout the U.S. filed a defective drugs lawsuit last week in a Los Angeles Court against Johnson & Johnson and two other companies who made, marketed and distributed the prescribed Ortho Evra birth control patch. Specifically, these women claim that the defendants waited four years after this product’s release to disclose some serious side effects of using Ortho Evra, including blood clots and strokes. All eleven women, ranging from ages 19 to 42, experienced blood clots after using Ortho Evra. Six of the women suffered a pulmonary embolism, while one woman experienced a stroke. The eleven women claiming personal injuries from this product are from California, Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina, New York, Georgia and Indiana.

The personal injury attorneys of the women claim that the defendants have described Ortho Evra side effects for years as merely including minor symptoms like nausea, headaches and a skin reaction where the patch is placed. They further allege that the defendants downplayed the risks of Ortho Evra, especially the assertion that the product delivers nearly 60 percent more estrogen than oral birth control tablets and consequently increases the risk factors of blood clots and strokes.

More than 4 million women have used Ortho Evra since it became commercially available in 2002. According to the personal injury lawsuit, Ortho Evra is one of the most commonly prescribed birth control patches today and the first and only one marketed as the once-a-week patch. Like oral birth control pills, Ortho Evra prevents pregnancies by preventing ovulation, thickening cervical mucus and altering the endometrium to reduce the likelihood of implantation.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • LinkedIn
  • Print this article!
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

0

Post a comment

PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT. THIS WEB SITE IS A GROUP ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEYS ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Total Injury is not a law firm. Total Injury does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. The information contained herein is not legal advice. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Any information you submit to Total Injury may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys. An attorney responsible for the content of this Site is Kevin W. Chern, Esq., licensed in Illinois with offices at 25 East Washington, Suite 510, Chicago, Illinois 60602. To see the attorney in your area who is responsible for this advertisement, please click here.

If you live in Florida, Mississippi, Missouri, New York or Wyoming, please click here for additional information.

The content found on the TotalInjury Blog is not legal advice and is purely for informational purposes. Total Injury, Inc. does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of submissions. The information provided by the bloggers on this site may not represent the opinions of the site editor(s), Total Injury, Inc. or its affiliates. The information contained herein is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. For additional disclaimers, please visit our Terms & Conditions. All photos are of models and do not depict clients.