Home » Sharon Stone Ordered to Pay $232,000



Sharon Stone Ordered to Pay $232,000

Posted by Chris Kramer | Posted in Personal Injury News

It’s been years of back and forth, but the case is now finally resolved. A Los Angeles jury ordered actress Sharon Stone to pay $232,000 to a man who says he was injured on her property in 2006.

Stone’s Property

This incident allegedly took place at Stone’s estate in the Los Angeles area, which in 1995, soon after becoming a megastar due to the hit movie “Basic Instinct”.

Stone planned to spend a couple of years expanding and refurbishing the 11,000 square-foot Mediterranean-style home (complete with a tennis court and a pool) before moving onto the property.

Lawsuit Details

Peter Krause (not the actor by the same name) says he fell more than 15 feet into a ravine while installing outdoor wiring for a backyard sound system on her estate. Apparently, he tried to grab onto a lattice fence on top of a retaining wall. When the fence collapsed, he slid onto a neighbor’s adjoining property, seriously damaging his knee.

Because of the injury, he asserts that he’s been limited in his job prospects. Two years after this alleged incident, he filed the lawsuit against Stone.

Krause’s lawyer, John Torjesen, argued that Stone’s fence was in violation of a Los Angeles city code that requires property owners to have sturdy fences on their land.

When Stone testified in her own defense, she claimed that she always has had a chain-link fence surrounding her backyard. The implication was that this situation could never have happened. Her fence was not made of wood as the plaintiff had stated.

Furthermore, Stone informed the jury that she enjoys gardening so she examines her property often. She also claimed that she had no firsthand knowledge Krause was ever injured on her estate.

In addition to the case’s unusual nature, jury selection brought one of its most memorable moments. A potential juror claimed she couldn’t consider the circumstances in a neutral way because she has no respect for Stone’s work as an actress.

The judge ignored her request to be released and sent her back into the jury pool.

The Verdict

The jury deliberated for an entire day before determining that Stone was at fault. They concluded that her fence was indeed inadequate and held her responsible.

Originally, Krause had asked for $1.5 million, which included pain and suffering as well as lost wages.

While Stone’s attorney, Jerry Popovich, agreed that medical damages did come to $33,000, he argued that Krause shouldn’t receive more than $120,000 for the rest of his claims.

In the end, the jury decided that Stone should pay Krause $232,000 to compensate him for his injuries.

Popovich is currently considering an appeal.

Be Sociable, Share!


Comments are closed.

PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT. THIS WEB SITE IS A GROUP ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEYS ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Total Injury is not a law firm. Total Injury does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. The information contained herein is not legal advice. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Any information you submit to Total Injury may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys. An attorney responsible for the content of this Site is Kevin W. Chern, Esq., licensed in Illinois with offices at 25 East Washington, Suite 510, Chicago, Illinois 60602. To see the attorney in your area who is responsible for this advertisement, please click here.

If you live in Florida, Mississippi, Missouri, New York or Wyoming, please click here for additional information.

The content found on the TotalInjury Blog is not legal advice and is purely for informational purposes. Total Injury, Inc. does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of submissions. The information provided by the bloggers on this site may not represent the opinions of the site editor(s), Total Injury, Inc. or its affiliates. The information contained herein is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. For additional disclaimers, please visit our Terms & Conditions. All photos are of models and do not depict clients.