Home » State Farm Declines California Car Accident Settlement, Now Has to Pay $667,000 for Elderly Woman’s Personal Injuries

Apr

10

State Farm Declines California Car Accident Settlement, Now Has to Pay $667,000 for Elderly Woman’s Personal Injuries

Posted by Editor | Posted in Personal Injury News

A California jury recently awarded a $667,000 personal injury verdict to an elderly Turlock woman who was involved in a 2005 head-on collision caused by a teenager. 73-year-old Nell Mathis Fortner required two surgeries on her leg after a car driven by then-17-year-old John Henry Kamps Schollenberg turned right, veered into an oncoming lane and hit her car. While Fortner and her California personal injury attorney Frank Zumwalt made a $400,000 settlement offer to State Farm, which held the auto insurance policy for Schollenberg, the company declined and decided to go to trial. This proved  to be a bad move for State Farm as the jury awarded Fortner an additional $267,000 at the end of the six-day trial.

The car accident occurred on January 13, 2005. At the time, Fortner was an in-home maid and on her way to care for a chemotherapy patient. Fortner was driving north of Modesto when Schollenberg, coming from the opposite direction, made a sharp right turn, veered into her lane and struck her vehicle head-on. Authorities estimated a 50-mph impact as Fortner was going 20 mph and Schollenberg was traveling 30 mph. While cited for traveling in the oncoming lane, Schollenberg was not prosecuted since officers did not do an accident reconstruction to prove he was recklessly speeding.

According to Zumwalt in an online story from the Modesto Bee, Fortner suffered a leg injury that has left her crippled, handicapped and impaired, and that the accident ultimately relegated her life to having a good meal and “hobbling around to doctors’ appointments.” He added that his client could no longer straighten her leg and now walks with a limp because of the accident. Schollenberg’s attorney, George Arata , could not be reached for comment but Zumwalt said in the story how his opposition tried to argue that some of Fortner’s injuries were from a pre-existing condition.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • LinkedIn
  • Print this article!
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

2

Comments (2)

I’d like to point out the fact that in the original story posted in the Modesto Bee; that neither myself, nor my lawyer was notified of this article. Nell Mathis Fortner had many preexisting injuries and health problems including: a poorly controlled case of Adult Onset Diabetes, degenerative arthritis, high blood pressure…and much more. I’ll have you know that i was at that trial, sitting in my chair listening to her lie about doctor’s records, and listen to her friends give, quite seemingly, the same story. All but one that is. One “witness” asked Zumwalt, and I quote, “How did i do?” after her testimony. Not to mention that in the jury-room my lawyer was told that one juror was pressing the others to award Mrs. Fortner with more money than most of them thought this case was worth. Is that cause for a mistrial? Welcome to California.

Farm workers are sometimes partly to blame for the accidents in which they are hurt. Working heavy machinery when tired, operating farm equipment without due caution, cutting corners with safety procedures in order to save time - there are many ways in which a farm accident victim can be partially responsible for his injuries.

Post a comment

PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT. THIS WEB SITE IS A GROUP ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEYS ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. It is not a lawyer referral service or prepaid legal services plan. Total Injury is not a law firm. Total Injury does not endorse or recommend any lawyer or law firm who participates in the network. It does not make any representation and has not made any judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating lawyer. The information contained herein is not legal advice. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Any information you submit to Total Injury may not be protected by attorney-client privilege. All photos are of models and do not depict clients. All case evaluations are performed by participating attorneys. An attorney responsible for the content of this Site is Kevin W. Chern, Esq., licensed in Illinois with offices at 25 East Washington, Suite 510, Chicago, Illinois 60602. To see the attorney in your area who is responsible for this advertisement, please click here.

If you live in Florida, Mississippi, Missouri, New York or Wyoming, please click here for additional information.

The content found on the TotalInjury Blog is not legal advice and is purely for informational purposes. Total Injury, Inc. does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of submissions. The information provided by the bloggers on this site may not represent the opinions of the site editor(s), Total Injury, Inc. or its affiliates. The information contained herein is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. For additional disclaimers, please visit our Terms & Conditions. All photos are of models and do not depict clients.